Claypot for my own picks: Shelbourne; Fram Hopefully the rest of the week will be better!
Did some test picks of my own (LESSON 3) at half time... Shall share my results
Case 1
1-0 Mypa 0-0.5 1.02 2-2.5 o1.06
HT Vassa 0.88 u 0.82
I took the liberty to subtract the TG offered by the current goal total: 2.25 - 1 = 1.25
Applying lesson 3: Bet Over,
AHO must be 1-1.5 of TG which in this case = 0.25 : 1.25
Give ball < Over ball AND BOTH > 1.00
VERDICT: TAKE OVER 2.25
RESULT:FT 1-0 [Can't seem to find out what's wrong here]
Case 2
0 - 0 Kuusyi Lahti 0.0 1.21 1.50 o 0.98
HT JaPs 0.66 u 0.84
TG was straightforward : 1.5
AHO must be 1-1.5 of TG which in this case = 0 : 1.5
Applying lesson 3: Bet Under,
AH > 1.05 and Give > Over and Over > Under
VERDICT: TAKE UNDER 1.5
RESULT:FT 0-1
CASE 3
1-0 IF Sylvia 0.50 1.20 2.5-3 o1.13
HT IK Sleipner 0.71 u0.74
During HT, it change handicap once
1-0 IF Sylvia 0/0.5 0.89 2.5-3 o1.13
ht IK Sleipner 0.99 u0.74
I applied what I previously did in Case 2 (I used the first set of odds before the Change)
TG= 2.75 - 1 = 1.75
AHO : TG = 0.5 : 1.75 (within 1.5)
AH > 1.05 and Give > Over and Over > Under
VERDICT: TAKE UNDER 2.75
FT : 2-2 [That change of handicap towards the end of HT, killed the test bet, in my opinion]
CASE 4
0-1 Randers FC 0.5-1 1.03 2.5-3 o1.07
HT FC Vestsjaelland 0.87 u0.81
Similar to CASE 1,
TG = 2.75 -1 = 1.75
AH : TG = 0.75 : 1.75 (within 1.5)
Give < Over AND BOTH >1.00
VERDICT: TAKE OVER 2.75
FT: 2-1 [ I felt confident enough midway through the half to post a running pick of o2.5 in running forum]
CASE 5
0-0 IF Sirius FK 0-0.5 1.08 1.50 o 1.02
HT IK Frej 0.80 u 0.84
NOTE THE SIMILARITY WITH CASE 2 (only the AH different) and CASE 3 (only that the handicap DID NOT change)
AH: TG = 0.25 : 1.50 (within 1.5)
AH > 1.05 and Give > Over and Over > Under
VERDICT: TAKE UNDER 1.5
FT : 0-0 [No change of AH / TG during HT, stabilised odds all the way through HT contribute to this correct pick]
In conclusion, I like to thank bro Klavier for showing us the way it's done in order for me to come up with these case studies.
Ball is round as presented in Case 1.
I personally believe the lessons CAN apply to half time and we should endeavour to find more examples to test on.
I didnt check the odds at the start, could probably contribute to all the FT results I have.
Fellow bros, please comment on what are the flaws I have and Improvements for me.
Thanks!
LET'S HUAT TOGETHER!